- November 15, 2022
- By admin
- okcupid-vs-match visitors
RONULO Versus. Anyone
FACTS: Rosa Catholic Parish Church of San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte. Yet not, at the time of your own wedding, the heading officiating priest, Fr. Mario Ragaza, refused to solemnize the wedding through to discovering the few were unsuccessful to help you safer a married relationship permit. Once the an excellent recourse, Joey, who was following wear barong tagalong, and you can Claire, clothed when you look at the a married relationship gown, along with their mothers, sponsors and you can customers, proceeded for the Separate Chapel from Filipino Christians, called the brand new Aglipayan Chapel. They questioned the fresh petitioner, an enthusiastic Aglipayan priest, to do a ceremony to which the second concurred despite having become advised because of the couples they had no marriage certificate.
The new petitioner wishing his choir and you can planned a bulk with the partners on a single go out. He presented the latest service in the visibility of the bridegroom, brand new bride-to-be, their moms and dads, the principal and second sponsors and also the rest of its desired customers.
Brand new prosecution’s witnesses, Joseph and you may Mary Anne Yere, affirmed on events of the ceremony. Joseph are the new veil mentor if you’re Mary Anne was the latest wire sponsor about wedding. Mary Anne affirmed one to she saw the fresh new bride walk down the fresh section. She in addition to spotted the happy couple exchange its wedding rings, kiss each other, and signal a document. She heard new petitioner training the main sponsors in order to indication the marriage contract. Afterwards, it went to the latest reception, got supper and got pictures. She watched the newest petitioner there.
Florida Umadac, mom regarding Joey, affirmed that she read the happy couple state in service you to definitely they just take both because wife and husband. Months following wedding, she went to the fresh new municipal regional municipal registrar out-of San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte that have Atty. Mariano R. Nalupta Jr. in which she got a certification one to zero wedding license try issued on partners.
The petitioner, if you’re admitting he held a ceremony, rejected that his operate out of blessing the happy couple is tantamount in order to a beneficial solemnization of your relationship while the contemplated by law.
ISSUE: Obtained brand new petitioner try guilty of violating Post 352 of one’s Revised Penal Password (RPC) having allegedly carrying out an illegal wedding service.
She including identified the marriage invitation supplied to her of the Joey
RATIO: Petitioner conducted an illegal marriage ceremony. The fresh new crime due to the fact provided for in the Art 352 of one’s RPC refers to the abilities regarding ily Code hence checks out:
(3) A married relationship ceremony that takes set with the appearance of the brand new contracting functions up until the solemnizing manager and their individual declaration one to it bring each other as the couple on the presence off no less than one or two witnesses from legal many years.
Ways. six. No given form or religious rite on the solemnization of marriage is required. It will likely be expected, however, toward hiring events to look physically up until the solemnizing officer and you may state on visibility of for around a few witnesses of courtroom decades which they just take each other because the partner and you will spouse. It declaration is going to be within the marriage certification and that will getting finalized by employing parties in addition to their witnesses and you can attested because of the solemnizing officer.
The new Best Court explained one to what generated the fresh petitioner’s operate an effective marriage service and not simply a mere true blessing is one if you are there isn’t any recommended form or religious rite, all that are called for was “for the employing parties to seem yourself until the solemnizing manager and you can claim in the visibility out of for around two witnesses of court decades which they take each other since the husband and you may partner.”
About what first criteria, this new petitioner acknowledge that events appeared just before your and that truth is actually affirmed so you’re able to of the witnesses. Towards the second criteria, we discover one to, against the petitioner’s allegation, the fresh new prosecution has proven, from the testimony out of witnesses, your contracting events directly announced that they simply take one another while Match vs OkCupid cost the wife and husband. Thus, it is obvious you to definitely petitioner presented a married relationship ceremony and not a mere blessing.